Free Citizen

2020-12-24

Now you and I and the rest of the normal world (not to mention almost all epidemiologists to date) have no doubt grown up with and accepted the concept of herd immunity - if enough people get exposure to a disease (either through catching it and recovering or through vaccination) then we become largely immune to it, and as more and more people achieve this happy immunity the pathogen has more and more trouble finding susceptible hosts to infect, so that the disease soon enough peters out.

So the recent report from the AIER comes as something of a surprise . . .

Does the WHO now somehow conclude that herd immunity can only be achieved through vaccination after all? This seems an extraordinary proposition that requires some explanation if we are to accept it.

The AIER has the story.

...

2020-12-24

The latest Tier4 tightenings of the Lockdown screws it now transpires may have been influenced by one Prof Neil Ferguson of Imperial College - but wait, wasn't his original contribution to the Government's Covid project discredited and didn't he resign from his advisory positions?

Maybe not - the Spectator has the story.

Call me old-fashioned, but doesn't this tell us all we need to know about this government's choice of "scientific" advisors?

2020-12-20

The AIER produces a quite arresting analysis of the events of 2020, taking an encompassing view of the various subjects (I'm not sure that they all strictly qualify as "sciences").

Quite rightly they take the proponents of lock-downs and other regressive measures to task:

"Yes, of course we must follow science, but we must do so in every field, not only in epidemiology but also in politics, economics, and philosophy"

"To be scientific in every field means to incorporate both theory and practice, to assess all real and relevant factors, not just a select few of them; it means cultivating a perspective that is likewise impartial (not biased), comprehensive (not narrow) view, and proportional (not imbalanced)"

A worthy review of how the science has

2020-12-20

How can we "know" what is going on?

Well, first-hand experience is probably the most reliable method - anything we can see, touch, hear, taste or smell is a good candidate for a high degree of certainty. If we hear someone say something and watch their lips move then we have two sources of information and the one (hopefully) corroborates the other - it doesn't get much more certain than that. However, it still doesn't vouch for the veracity of what was said, only that the person said it.

Second-hand experience is what we usually have to work with - we can see something in a newspaper, watch a report on TV, and so on, but these could all be easily faked. So we have to rely on other factors to corroborate the original, and here we come up against the problems and opportunities of trust.

If we trust the source of the report then we are likely to believe it. If we don't trust the source then we will be sceptical unless we can see corroborative reports

2020-12-18

One of the things that has surprised me this autumn is the number of different sources of unrelated categories of information that are all coming around to the central question of our time:-

What the COVID is going on?!

We have seen offerings from Green Med Info (an alternative health site), from news journalists (sadly now few and far between) from independent individuals

2020-12-15

Many thanks to Lockdown Sceptics for this link:

Like / Dislike this video here.

More about this performer here.

2020-11-27

Lockdown Sceptics publishes an article by well qualified authors (including Dr Mike Yeadon) which forensically explains how reliance on the PCR test is producing a "pseudo-epidemic".

"A false positive pseudo-epidemic is a well described phenomenon in the medical literature which results in an exponential rise in diagnosed cases and deaths but no excess deaths. PCR testing is renowned for it and the “second wave” of Swine Flu in 2009 was entirely a false positive pseudo-epidemic only stopped by stopping the testing"

This is the simple key point at issue which fatally undermines the whole government-by-big-pharma covid narrative, and the cogent arguments presented in this article deserve everybody's full attention, especially as we learn today that "end of lockdown" most emphatically does not involve any significant relaxation of

2020-11-25

Del Bigtree is a long-time journalist campaigning for vaccine truth, and has been diligently researching who benefits from the proposed mass Covid vaccinations of the world.

This is their report - it names names and names vaccines. Conflicts of interest at the heart of a US medical regulatory authority? Surely not?

This follows on from previous ICAN lawsuits:

Sept 2018: "Stipulated Order Confirming non-Compliance with 42 USC 300AA-27C"

"In 1986 Congress charged Health and Human Services (HHS) with the primary responsibility of ensuring vaccine

2020/11/18

The AIER, noting the dearth of attempts to measure the costs associated with locking down a population, has published its own summary of the many different unwanted outcomes. Whilst the many and varied effects are difficult to reduce to a single measure, the overall list makes for salutary reading.

Based on figures mainly for the United States, they include reports from the UK and elsewhere where available.

2020/11/17

Monday's UK Column News report provides perhaps an unwelcome glimpse of where we are headed in the UK. It is admirably summed up by David Scott part-way through and in my opinion is essential viewing, touching as it does on so many of the major topics of the day:

Like / Dislike this video here.

Towards the end they disclose that up to 14 thousand may be working for the Cabinet Office - more than enough to give a mere 650 MPs the run-around I would think.

To adapt a quote from Shelley's "Ozymandias": "Look on my works, ye Mighty People, and despair!"

2020/11/17

Apparently the Liverpool testing programme is less than fully formed - this article in the BMJ explores the quick-turn-around test currently piloted in Liverpool and already being rolled out elsewhere in what to some might seem like unthinking haste, given that the pilot scheme has not yet been evaluated.

"This is a screening programme, not opportunistic case finding: people are invited to have a test they would not otherwise have had, or asked for. If judged against the criteria drawn up by the UK’s National Screening Committee for appraisal of a programme’s viability, effectiveness, and appropriateness, it does not do well and has been already roundly criticised"

"The test’s instructions for use state that it should not be used on asymptomatic people . . . . It suggests the test misses between one in two and one in four cases. The false positive rate of 0.6% means that at the current

2020/11/12

Citizen X does us all a service with this timely soliloquy on the subject of freedom.

In these times when the Covid threat appears to many to be wildly exaggerated in order to frighten us into obedience to instructions which, this time last year, would have been considered ridiculous, and when the Metropolitan Police have recently been filmed using batons against peaceful protesters, we would do well to mark what he says.

Like / Dislke this video here.

2020/11/11

Politico blows the whistle on the government's crazy response to the Covid situation:

Like / Dislike this video here.

For what it's worth, I think Politico is spot on.

2020/11/11

Tucker Carlson is one of the few US commentators who will give voice to those whom the rest of the mainstream media will not. Here is his independent view on the current state of the Presidential Election:

"the only solution is honesty"

Like / Dislike this video here.

2020/11/10

Andy Thomas is a long-time speaker, lecturer, researcher - and organiser of the Glastonbury Symposium (no topic off-limits?), which unhappily had to be brutally restructured this year from the usual full three day event down to a one day Zoom call.

This video is taken from his presentation on that zoom call, back at the end of July, and it is interesting to consider where we were then against where we are now, in November.

Whatever your take on this year's happenings, Andy is noted for his impartiality, objectivity, and meticulous search for and analysis of the evidence. I'm sure you will find much to contemplate here:

Like / Dislike this

2020/11/09

Richard LittleJohn in the Daily Mail tells it as he sees it, no hold barred.

"You can sleep with your wife but can't play tennis with her".

The word "lies" features.

"It’s a fact, not a ‘projection’, that 99.5 per cent of people who contract coronavirus recover from it. Many don’t even display symptoms." He doesn't mention where he gets that "fact" from but he's probably in the right ball-park.

Good to see more and more articles in the mainstream that challenge the absurdities of lockdown.

See more of his articles in the Mail on-line.

2020/11/07

Dr Charlie Ward may not be known to many but his approach to life and the US Election is to say the least unconventional.

But is he on the right track? He certainly seems to be very well informed.

We will very soon find out, but my money is on Dr Charlie for giving us the real news.

"Turn the TV off and start to find peace".

Are you listening BBC?

I predict a lot of very red faces in the media (and in politics) on both sides of the Atlantic before very long.

2020/11/06

The Daily Mail reveals what is really going on in "our" NHS. A whistle-blower has publicly resigned after revealing that "she 'had no work for three weeks' at the height of the pandemic.

Somehow I don't believe that she will be the last whistle-blower to come forward. Will the whole house of cards come crashing down shortly? Probably not, but the cracks are beginning to show.

Meanwhile the Daily Telegraph takes apart the Covid projections that purported to show that the NHS was on course to be overwhelmed unless Boris took drastic lock-down action. If the government can't ensure that it's basic evidence is reasonably bullet-proof than what hope for

2020/11/05

On this 5th day of November 2020 we mark the fact that Parliament for a second time simply nodded away our freedoms, with no real attempt to question the validity of the undoubtedly controversial "science" that our Government (Boris and Matt) is relying on, or to ensure that the collateral damage that will inevitably ensue has been properly assessed against the alleged risks to health and to the NHS.

Parliament now cannot escape the charge that it is either complicit or asleep on the job.

Viv Evans in Independence Daily sums up the thoughts of many.

Also today Professor David Miles CBE is interviewed on

2020/11/05

Brexit-Watch weigh in on Covid? What is going on?

"What has gone terribly wrong is the Government and its associated apparatus of the state does not trust us. In effect they say we are not intelligent, or responsible enough to make our own choices based on widely available evidence. The man from the ministry knows best and you, little person, aren’t competent to make up your own mind. That is the road to serfdom."

This has been coming a long time. The choice we are offered is between freedom and "safety". in 1949 we chose freedom, but who will lead us to freedom today?

Apparently not the Danes, who are reportedly

Page 207 of 209