2020/11/14

A legal opinion piece from State of the Nation reminds us of a home truth concerning fraud  - in Common Law it vitiates everything that depends upon it.

It's true that they had the US election in mind when this was written, but it applies equally in Common Law jurisdictions.

Something that anybody who wants to impose a new-technology vaccine (that has not completed its formal approvals process) on us for a virus that has not been proven to exist might be wise to ponder upon.

Dr Mike Yeadon has made his views known to Matt Hancock (06/09/2020) (and to us via Twitter) - I reproduce the text below (my highlight):

...

2020/11/13

And just in time for Christmas? Who would have thought it? And Matt Hancock has millions of doses lined up for mass vaccinations starting from 1st December? Wow! What foresight!

Just a minute though - has this vaccine completed all its trials for efficacy and safety yet? (no).

Has our government pushed through measures that enable it to proceed with vaccinations before the usual regulatory approval has been given? (yes)

And has the vaccine manufacturer been granted legal indemnity in the event that this vaccine causes serious side-effects or even death? (yes)

Who is shouldering all the risk here? The same mob who never got the opportunity to decide whether it would be a good idea to order all these vaccine doses at (our) huge expense? Or to decide if we wanted to bypass the usual checks and balances? (yes)

The Trial:

...

2020/11/13

More good sense from the AIER. More tests might be a good idea if the testing regime were designed to estimate the prevalence of the infection within the population, but it seems that no statistical rigour has been employed - it's just "test more people, test everybody" apparently regardless of the absurd cost!

Can "our" government find no qualified statisticians to get this testing shambles under control and bring the costs down to earth? If not, why not? Surely it cannot actually want the current free-for-all to continue?

Dr Mike Yeadon has more - and more qualified than he

2020/11/11

Politico blows the whistle on the government's crazy response to the Covid situation:

Like / Dislike this video here.

For what it's worth, I think Politico is spot on.

2020/11/10

Andy Thomas is a long-time speaker, lecturer, researcher - and organiser of the Glastonbury Symposium (no topic off-limits?), which unhappily had to be brutally restructured this year from the usual full three day event down to a one day Zoom call.

This video is taken from his presentation on that zoom call, back at the end of July, and it is interesting to consider where we were then against where we are now, in November.

Whatever your take on this year's happenings, Andy is noted for his impartiality, objectivity, and meticulous search for and analysis of the evidence. I'm sure you will find much to contemplate here:

Like / Dislike this

2020/11/09

. . . but from the war on what?

John Rappoport may seem uncompromising but is he wrong? He makes a great deal of sense to me, so I have little hesitation in featuring items from his blog on this site even though not everyone will agree with everything he says.

He doesn't pull any punches.

Here are his latest thoughts on vote fraud, lawyers, COVID vaccine, Biden plan, police powers, the Constitution. To which one might add the media attempting to usurp the power of the Electoral College to announce the next president of the United States - and various politicians from around the world falling in

2020/11/09

Richard LittleJohn in the Daily Mail tells it as he sees it, no hold barred.

"You can sleep with your wife but can't play tennis with her".

The word "lies" features.

"It’s a fact, not a ‘projection’, that 99.5 per cent of people who contract coronavirus recover from it. Many don’t even display symptoms." He doesn't mention where he gets that "fact" from but he's probably in the right ball-park.

Good to see more and more articles in the mainstream that challenge the absurdities of lockdown.

See more of his articles in the Mail on-line.

2020/11/06

The Daily Mail reveals what is really going on in "our" NHS. A whistle-blower has publicly resigned after revealing that "she 'had no work for three weeks' at the height of the pandemic.

Somehow I don't believe that she will be the last whistle-blower to come forward. Will the whole house of cards come crashing down shortly? Probably not, but the cracks are beginning to show.

Meanwhile the Daily Telegraph takes apart the Covid projections that purported to show that the NHS was on course to be overwhelmed unless Boris took drastic lock-down action. If the government can't ensure that it's basic evidence is reasonably bullet-proof than what hope for

2020/11/05

Sir Desmond is here interviewed by Jonathan Saxty of Brexit Watch.

Some of us who have seen his recent interventions in the House of Commons may be familiar with his admirable clarity of thought and exposition. Here he reviews the status of the Covid Lockdown, moving on to give his views on the current state of the Brexit negotiations.

Unmissable:

Like / Dislike this video here.

2020/11/05

On this 5th day of November 2020 we mark the fact that Parliament for a second time simply nodded away our freedoms, with no real attempt to question the validity of the undoubtedly controversial "science" that our Government (Boris and Matt) is relying on, or to ensure that the collateral damage that will inevitably ensue has been properly assessed against the alleged risks to health and to the NHS.

Parliament now cannot escape the charge that it is either complicit or asleep on the job.

Viv Evans in Independence Daily sums up the thoughts of many.

Also today Professor David Miles CBE is interviewed on

2020/11/05

Dave Cullen casts a wearied Irish eye over the latest covidiocies to be inflicted upon these isles in the run up to whatever Christmas has in store for us.

Like / Dislike this video here.

Here he is again, putting two and two together to make . . .     well, you decide!

Like / Dislike this video here.

2020/11/05

Brexit-Watch weigh in on Covid? What is going on?

"What has gone terribly wrong is the Government and its associated apparatus of the state does not trust us. In effect they say we are not intelligent, or responsible enough to make our own choices based on widely available evidence. The man from the ministry knows best and you, little person, aren’t competent to make up your own mind. That is the road to serfdom."

This has been coming a long time. The choice we are offered is between freedom and "safety". in 1949 we chose freedom, but who will lead us to freedom today?

Apparently not the Danes, who are reportedly

Brian Rose Interviews Dr Rashid Buttar

2020/11/03

The Reform UK Party will favour a nuanced approach founded upon the principles of the Great Barrington Declaration, allowing the majority of the economy to remain open.

Brexit Watch brings us an interview with Richard Tice to explain all:

Like / Dislike this video here.

2020/11/03

Couldn't happen here? Watch and make up your own mind.

2020/11/02

The AIER explains the practical implications of rushing out a Covid vaccine.

2020/11/02

Tim Price has had enough - contribute to his Go-Fund-Me campaign here.

"The funds will be used to pay legal fees for an action against the government on the grounds of false imprisonment, i.e. that the lockdown was never legal in the first case. All Britons who care about their freedom are invited to participate"

Like / Dislike this video here.

2020/11/02

"Australians are having a Globalist Agenda pushed upon them . . .  "

2020/11/02

Now that Boris has made the fatal announcement (before consulting Parliament), there will be no going back. Indeed, already certain sources are puffing the idea that the lockdown will not end in December . . .

So I have done my own research into the latest figures for Wk 43, to see if anything has changed since week 42.

The Public Health England week 44 (up to week 43) (download here) “flu-like” report shows Covid positive tests ever-rising – so maybe we have it (or maybe we don’t - the test isn't definitive and is known to give false positive results anyway), but if we aren’t getting sick then who cares? As usual these meaningless numbers are analysed every which way, but can’t tell us who is sick

2020/11/02

Gemma O'Doherty is speaking from an Irish perspective, but we are all in the same boat, facing the same problem, and she quotes from a response to an FOI request made to the UK Department of Health and Social Care:

2022-12-02

Well, that seems to have died a death for whatever reason - but here is an alternate source of the same video: