Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2022-12-23

It is well recognised that the lie is halfway around the world before the truth has put its boots on. I suppose that in this day and age we should be using an updated metaphor - perhaps that the lie has flashed through all corners of the internet before the truth has booted up it's PC and remembered its password.

Still, the parable of the hare and the tortoise also springs to mind - steady and reliable eventually triumphs over fast fancy and fleeting. The truth will out, as they say, just as soon as the inevitable inconsistencies occasioned by the lie become exposed. It's only a matter of time and perseverance.

Hence the necessity for ever more censorship by those who do not want the truth exposed. Censorship that will in the end prove inadequate to the ever-expanding task of covering up all the  inconsistencies rippling from the original lie. 

In summary - the truth has integrity whilst the lie does not.

One of the many inconsistencies exposed by the Covid pandemic was the sudden edict from Boris that we should all start wearing face masks.

What was strange about that? It was issued in the middle of July 2020 when the deaths / hospitalisations "by Covid" had fallen away to no more than a trickle, in complete compliance with expectation for any and all conventional seasonal respiratory illness, and without any specific medical cure being offered.

You didn't have to be a highly-qualified epidemiologist to see that.

So why the obviously unnecessary edict? Even if face masks worked, they were not necessary in mid July, and we knew that "Covid" could be beaten without them because that had just been demonstrated through the February-June period when nobody was asked to wear masks. 

It's unwise to argue against logic.

So Boris didn't argue, he simply said we had to "follow the science".

But what is "the science"? One thing it isn't is an immutable fully understood entity that can be Googled up on the internet. Google it up and you will find many versions of "the science" depending on whom you ask (or you used to before Google was co-opted for censorship purposes).

Indeed there were many highly qualified opinions available (including those promoted by SAGE prior to July) that held that masks were not only unnecessary but perhaps unhelpful in most circumstances. 

So what changed?


Speaking about the inconsistencies that may eventually catch out the lie, here is another interesting factoid about the man who was central to the design of the ill-defined PCR test for Covid that was endorsed as the standard by the World Health Organisation.