2022-03-27
It's a good job that EU leaders are still looking to our health needs despite the dominating imperative of dealing with the war in the Ukraine, otherwise we might forget to demand that they negotiate a new international treaty to make us all obey the diktats of the WHO, and we would risk obliteration by the next pandemic.
The European Council (ie: the pinnacle of the EU power pyramid, and not to be confused with the Council of Europe) has set out its vision of how it intends to place the EU nations under the control of the UN by international treaty so that they can all be protected from the next pandemic under the wise guidance - no wait, that was the last pandemic - under the orders of the UN's WHO (ably assisted of course by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation et al).
What could possibly go wrong?
Now I've been on this earth for well over half a century and never experienced a genuine pandemic until Covid (and readers will know that I take issue with the word "genuine" in this connection).
"They" have tried previously to bull up various diseases (SARS, MERS, Ebola, AIDS) but none could be made up to amount to more than a molehill in the global scale of things, so why the insistence that we're all gonna die in the next few years?
Call me old-fashioned (thank you!) but I'm not buying it, nor am I buying the vaccine narrative that follows the pandemic narrative as night follows day. When I was a lad a vaccine would be administered before the illness strikes, not after it's in full swing, and would be expected to stop you getting the illness.
But I forgot - vaccines according to the latest definition don't actually have to protect against catching the disease ... which rather begs the question of what do we now call an injection that keeps us safe from catching something?
James Corbett (AKA the Corbett Report) writing for Technocracy News and Trends isn't buying it either.
