Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2023-08-15

Way back in 2020 we published the assertion that the PCR test was inaccurate and unsuitable for purpose.

Amazingly no "scientific" refutation of that assertion has ever to my knowledge been published, but we have today a new paper that makes exactly the same point:

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

Now all that is required is to follow the logic of the situation ... if the test is meaningless, then so is the pandemic.

Are there any reasonable grounds for believing that the global pandemic pushed by all the medical and governmental authorities (in conjunction with a global campaign to suppress all possible alternative treatments) was all a regrettable but innocent mistake?

So who was pushing the tests?

Cui Bono?

Who was medically qualified or legally obliged to know better?

If the pandemic was a falsehood, then what was in the phials that fed the campaigns of jabs?

Why are excess death levels now trending higher around the quaxxinated world and why do the said medical and governmental authorities not want to investigate this phenomenon?

And finally, why does the WHO want to cement their global control of pandemic response into a legally binding treaty? 

It's not hard to connect the dots; but if we still say that the case isn't proven, I suggest that we should consider the nature of the downside risk and see if it might be at all worrying. 

"There are none so blind as those who will not see".