Legal Repeal

21:03:45

This is a new topic for Alex Krainer, with whom we are familiar for his expertise in geopolitics.

But this is all about the current parlous state of British "politics".

That he thinks this is huge is significant.

(36 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-03-01

The Daily Express Reports.

(12 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-25

A lot of good sense here that everyone should understand.

(35 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-24

Graham Moore of the English Constitution Party discusses the state of English politics in the wake of the Rupert Lowe phenomenon.

Whether we agree with him or not, he raises some very pertinent questions that need to be addressed.

It's not a question of right or wrong, it's a question of how we want to structure our British Isles for the future.

After all, in the past the separations were largely determined by our differing historical political and religious backgrounds, but provided we can all achieve comparable freedoms, does it really matter whether we end up as a "united kingdom" or as separate independent nations united in brotherhood?

Given the modern trend toward ever greater levels of communications of all types, I'm not sure that I would lose too much sleep over the distinction, although unpicking the current entanglement of deliberately obfuscated constitutions in the most beneficial way will be a

2026-02-22

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS)

As one might expect, this body was also linked in with Operation Talla.

2026-02-22

"The Criminal Justice System Strategic Command Structure"

Source: Witness statement INQ000188838 (COVID Inquiry disclosure)

So how did Operation Talla differ from the CJSSCS?

Policing Representation within CJSSC and the Structural LinkBetween CJSSC and Operation Talla

"Operation Talla and CJSSC are not institutionally separate systems"

Gregor McGill's Witness Statement at the COVID Inquiry

2026-02-22

Ian Clayton previously discussed the legal precedents set by Miller and Dytham here.

This is an updated version of the same article.

2026-02-22

This is a timely reminder from Ian Clayton on the rule of law, what it means, who administers it, who controls it, who operates it.

"The rule of law is a constitutional trust held on behalf of the public"

In this day and age, more than a few people need to be reminded of these basics.

2026-02-22

The part played by the South Wales Police in Operation Talla is explored by Ian Clayton in this document. 

Request for constitutional clarification on sworn evidence given by the Crown Prosecution Service to the UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry

2026-02-22

Re: Police case number 6029679/21 & 01/62447/24.

From Telegram Crime Channel 6029679/21 & 01/62447/24 dated 9 February 2026.

The communication below has today been sent to the Treasury Solicitor - the Head of the Government Legal Department.

The House of Commons Justice and Public Administration & Constitutional Affairs Committees have been copied in.

"Dear Sir or Madam

Re: Operation Talla - Evidential Bundle and Notice of Ongoing Independent Investigation

I write to place on record, for the attention of the Government Legal Department, a bundle of primary-source material relating to the national policing response known as Operation Talla.

2026-02-22

Rape Gangs.

" 'Politicians wanted to keep a lid on it' This was a hierarchy of priorities, unmistakably revealed"

"The pressing question is not what an integrity mechanism would look like. It is why such a mechanism has not appeared, and why, under the present dispensation, it cannot"

"A state that is more alert to reputational hazard than to predatory harm, and more protective of its moral self-image than of its children, has inverted the moral hierarchy"

No to mention the legal hierarchy. 

Yes, the grooming gangs scandal has exposed the fact that many of our public servants and indeed parliamentarians have

2026-02-20

"None of the most basic facts have been confirmed"

"All attention has now converged on a single question... "

(59 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-18

Asking obvious questions is becoming rather too obvious a pastime nowadays.

With the release of the Epstein files by the very authorities responsible for apprehending and prosecuting such criminals, one might have expected st least the primary suspects to have been rounded up for investigation. It's not as though here is any lack of them.

The Daily Sceptic asks the obvious questions about one (of our more than one) high profile examples. 

The old maxim "be ye never so high, the law is above you" seems remarkable these days mainly in its lack of application by our authorities.

But perhaps the answers are so obvious that it's really not even worth asking

2026-02-18

Childrens' Health Defense has filed a RICO lawsuit alleging racketeering against the American Academy of Pediatrics.

In other words, they are setting out in Court to prove that the vaccine industry is all about profit for Big Pharma and its associates rather than childrens' health.

This site wishes them Godspeed.

2026-02-15

Chinese New Year is upon us, and it begins with a bit of word-play at President Xi's expense.

The demand is for "Habeas Corpus" - where is General Zhang Youxia, and who holds him?

(60 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-13

Fall in with the wrong crowd, fall in with the wrong peer pressure.

It's pretty much that simple.

So it is with drugs. Go to the NHS, get drugs.

Better still, fall in with the wrong group, get cannabis and/or other "recreational" drugs. Get schizophrenia (or other descriptive "diagnosis"), go to the NHS and get more drugs to offset the effects of your recreational usage. 

Yet we did not fall ill for want of a pharmaceutical product. 

You can see where this is going. It's so easy to follow the herd and get inappropriate intervention upon inappropriate intervention, and it doesn't end well.

Except for Big Pharma of course, who continue to get high prices for stuff that may not work and we pay through the nose in taxes for "free at the point of use".... it's a business model to die for, but it's not Big Pharma that does

2026-02-11

It must be every spokesperson's fear, that the statements they make in contentious but complex high profile cases may come back to haunt them.

"... a monumental shift that disproves the Trump administration’s narrative that the action it has been taken on the Epstein Files has been made with the aim of providing full transparency"

So did Kash Patel lay himself open to humiliation by an incorrect answer to a question in Congress?

ZeroHedge reports on a day of unredacted viewing.

2026-02-11

Martin Geddes, fresh from his delta-sigma analysis, now turns his thoughts to the function that "attribution" plays in a Court of Law.

Or should play, but apparently doesn't always?

"The degradation itself is the game being played"

"... when you strip these failures down to their atomic elements, they repeatedly reduce to misattribution... "

"... In each case the object is not treated as a hypothesis to be proven, but as a premise to be relied upon..."

Now listen up, this is serious.

2026-02-11

If we care about the way that Justice (in its widest sense) is administered in this country, and maybe if we have an academic approach to such matters, then I guess we should.

If our academic abilities are dodgy but out approach logical, then we probably should.

If our logic is all over the place and we still have implicit faith in our authorities, then I would steer well clear.

That said, Martin Geddes has come up with an analytical approach (the "Delta-Sigma framework") to assess legalistic encounters with our authorities, that clarifies how our approach may be usefully constructed to illuminate the responses provided by authorities to our legitimate queries.

The previously unachievable (due to the huge investment of time and research required) being now achievable by anybody with a practical working knowledge of AI and the tenacity and logical mind necessary to work through the

2026-02-07

One may argue about how "democracy" died, but assuredly the Epstein revelations will be one of the many stilletos found between the ribs.

Purists will rightly retort "define 'democracy'!", but I use the term to refer to the western "democratic" tradition exemplified by our own "mother of parliaments" in Westminster. The USA has its own bicameral legislature within a federation of states, which to our eyes is equally (if perhaps rather more obviously) corrupted.

Just as a fish is said to rot from the head, so a "democracy" rots from its pinnacle of centralised power, the government. Humanity is an imperfect creation, the government is (supposedly) human, therefore the government is corruptible, and subject to the iron law of computing and life itself - "if it can happen, it will".

It did, and it just got found out for all to see.

Page 1 of 31