Legal Legal Repeal

2025-01-30

Following on from the earlier Brick in the Wall communication (which of course we all watched mulled and eventually fully understood), this video starts by reviewing the Trump "inauguration".

"... they had to break that because there is no corporate and there is no spirit within the corporate..."

"... unfortunately the general public is not aware of the joke... "

Is nothing is as it appears?

I suspect so. The style of delivery is demanding of his viewers, but if we want the truth we need to work at it, as it has been forever obscured beneath multiple layers of fiction.

We are facing the deepest Challenge of the Assumptions! 

Still, one can begin to piece together certain

2025-01-28

The Brownstone Institute reviews a number of "the Donald" 's executive orders that have slapped a wide-ranging communications ban on the US public health bureaucracies.

One might speculate that investigative measures may follow in due course, with consequences that only a few outside of the medical-pharmaceutical-public-health bureaucracies may foresee.

"One Health, as newly embraced by the CDC, amounts to a radical transformation of the basis of social order itself, under the guidance of god-like scientists who alone know how to structure the best life for all living things"

"How it came to be that our main engines of public health came to be captured in whole by such a crazed ideology would require a deep and expansive investigation"

"Now Dr.... heads the agency he defied. He remains in that position until the man once called a “fringe epidemiologist” by the previous head of NIH takes

2025-01-28

This is the latest article from Martin Geddes.

If you only ever read one of his articles, read this one, very carefully, and watch the linked video.

The wheels of justice grind slow, but they grind to dust. But these particular wheels will likely grind much faster than anybody is prepared for - if my understanding is correct.

It illuminates cartels in a whole new light.

Maybe there was a reason that Trump wanted TikTok reinstated in America.

I am no lawyer, and this is not legal advice. Please do your own due diligence.

2025-01-27

A everybody no doubt realises, Baroness Hallett's "Covid Inquiry Module 4" hearings grind on, succumbing to handy confusions over terminology which would be unacceptable in a school debating society.

Are the differences between Process 1 and Process 2 the same as the differences between Processes A and B?

I suppose it depends on how closely and confidently you were able to attend and decipher the long and rambling question.

"The inquiry has thus enabled a situation where the primary failing of the MHRA has apparently been denied. The truth can now be dismissed as yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ "

Happily for us mere mortals, the Perseus Group (who they?) has form in questioning the response of the UK medical regulators to the Covid alleged pandemic, and

2025-01-27

No, apparently his case has not fallen by the wayside, it is progressing on the basis of factual discovery.

Of course that means a delay whilst the necessary facts are discovered, and brought before the Court, but hey, that can't be too difficult for our safety-conscious no-stones-unturned medical-pharmaceutical-political complex can it? 

They have been given 3 days (until tomorrow 28th January).

Place your bets now...

2025-01-27

Martin Geddes provokes our little grey cells once more.

His journey from matters material/commercial through matters legal and on to matters spiritual has been a fascinating tale, and has exposed how he considers that the matters legal may conflict with both the spiritual and the inappropriate implementation of the legal.

Javier Milei encapsulated the folly of trying to legislate for every possibility when he noted "the infinite expansion of the aberrant state" in his recent address to Davos 2025, although he probably had more in mind than just rules and regulations (the State being very prone these days to extend its reach into control of matters parental and much else besides).

Jesus himself set the scene where the Bible records

2025-01-23

"Chris Whitty... told the Covid Inquiry this week that the decision to mandate Covid jabs was “100 per cent a political one” and he was "sceptical" of it"

"Has the public health establishment at least learned something from the last few years?"

If nothing else, these last few years have permitted the "public health establishment" in all its varied forms to demonstrate that they are totally immune to all criticism, whether justified or not. Immune even to the Nuremberg Codes that declared unequivocally that anybody to be subjected to a medical experiment must be (a) fully informed of the risks (b) free to decline to take part. They were coerced at every turn into taking an experimental intervention described as a "vaccine" which was in fact a largely untested gene therapy that turned out to confer no stoppage of onward transmission and negligible effective

2025-01-18

This guy isn't the most straightforward to understand, but I suspect nor is he to be ignored.

In a world that seems increasingly likely governed by a fraudulent system centred on the United Nations, we are overdue a Great Reset away from the current legal jurisdiction of the Law of the Sea, toward a simpler law of the land.

Exactly how this may play out has so far defeated my understanding, but in principle I warm to it.

Given the events due to start tomorrow (19th and 20th January) in DC, it would rather stretch belief to blithely assume that this is unrelated.

(10 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-01-10

"We have not had a Republic since at least 1871.. "

"We the people have been brainwashed, programmed, tricked... "

"... NO! We are the government, 'We the People'... "

" How do you have a Territory get a Statehood? Here's the checklist... "

" They were able by November 2010 to get the Republic restored "

"... he was on President Biden's clemency list... "  

(57 minutes)

2025-01-08

A tale of incompetence, or of deliberate obfuscation?

We may never know, but it's a salutary story that leaves Canada...  well, apparently in some sort of legal limbo (don't quote me, I'm not a constitutional lawyer!).

If this could happen to Canada, what other prior colonies might be similarly affected?

And how might this affect the coming changes that 2025/6 may or may not bring forth?

Not to mention anybody with a "Canadian passport"?

(49 minutes)

2024-12-27

Can AI be useful in challenging the iniquities of the current allegedly fake legal system?

The Law is a monstrous edifice of common law accepted principles, parliamentary statutes, regulations, judges, barristers, regulators, codes of conduct which may or may not be legally binding, all given force by case law (a statute does not become law until the courts have ruled on relevant cases).

Oh, and ignorance of the law is no excuse!

So the man or woman on the Clapham omnibus may feel that the odds in court are stacked against him/her. How to understand it all? How to identify the weak points in a case? How to present those points in the best way to achieve a just and successful outcome?How to devise tactics appropriate to the circumstances? How to find the time to understand it all, or even find a competent and trustworthy lawyer (should such be affordable)?

...

2024-12-18

Interest of Justice reports that Costa Rica is holding Huawei accountable in the Courts for "alleged corruption and misconduct" in relation to its 5G network.

"By addressing corruption and cybersecurity risks associated with 5G networks, Costa Rica is proving that even a small nation can take on powerful entities to safeguard its people and principles"

"... accusations include fraud, bribery, influence peddling, and actions against the public treasury related to contracts for 3G and 5G deployment"

"The Chinese Embassy in Costa Rica swiftly condemned these actions, labeling the allegations against Huawei as “irresponsible and unfounded”

Read the full story.

2024-12-18

Martin Geddes once more highlights a case of apparent injustice.

Michael Humble court complaint

2024-12-14

Are our Magistrates Courts all they seem?

Martin Geddes is on the case... 

2024-12-13

The Postmaster General gives the UN short shrift for non-compliance.

(13 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-12-13

Postmaster Russell-Jay: Gould explains the global basis of the law.

If you can't get your head around this, it may be best to stay out of Court... because they probably can't either...

(9 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-12-11

Has he gone and joined the "born-again crowd"?

Well, I guess that to answer that question we would have to define "born-again crowd".

But then the nit-picking would begin as the various nuances of the expression would need to be picked over, discussed, theological books consulted and if found wanting, rewritten, all of which would likely generate far more acres of controversy that may or may not be related to the original question.

It could become a costly and ultimately pointless never-ending exercise.

But what is the alternative?

Indeed,Is there an alternative?

2024-11-29

Another offering from someone who would advise us on the rules of law as practised in the courts of our land.

What to do?

First, know your enemy...   

Secondly, retain the initiative...

Thirdly, know your legal history...

Fourthly, decide if taking on the legal leviathan on its own terms is really for you.

Make of this what you will.

(41 minutes)

2024-11-29

Nick Hubble notes the opioid smuggling into the USA (not to mention Europe & UK).

Trump's proposed import tariffs are being leveraged by the need to stop this trade,  the precursors to fentanyl being reportedly sourced from Chinese factories.

The Chinese were on the receiving end of the original opium wars, prosecuted by the British, and others in their interests of trading Chinese tea silk etc not for the silver that the Chinese demanded, but for the opium grown by the British in India.

"History rhyming to an extraordinary extent"

(14 minutes)

...

2024-11-29

Update and Thanksgiving Review from the Interest of Justice in Costa Rica.

Their efforts have been Herculean, but it's not over yet...

"Today, Thursday, November 28, 2024, we at Interest of Justice (IoJ) want to extend our deepest thanks to you!"

"From the bottom of our hearts, we thank you for standing with us as we seek to bring light to the darkest injustices affecting public health and weaponized government. Together, we hold on to the hope and determination that truth, freedom, and justice will prevail. We KNOW it will prevail. It’s humanities destiny"

There's a wealth of information here, with links to numerous previous articles on all matters Covid. If you have