Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

The Time of Creative Destruction?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 829

2025-02-04

As always, this is not financial advice - nor is it party-political - but as usual it does throw some interesting observations on the intersection of politics and economics.

In fact I'm more than ever convinced that politics economics and psychology/psychopathy are just three sides of the same triangle. To learn any one or two without the other is simply to remain ignorant of the operation of the whole.

So today the good folk at Fortune and Freedom bring us not one, but two articles for the reading of one. If we have been following the scurrilous end of the social media channels, we may have been puzzled (especially if we've have been following the in-my-view highly dubious "Trump coin" caravan). So this may be of interest. And they don't come any more political than "the Donald".

Today we can see that we live in a time of the creative destruction of politics, economics, and psychopathy as currently practised ... and perhaps much more, since these in turn depend on our understanding of our historical development. Is our accepted history also bunk?

Whatever, our task is to prepare for the rebuilding that will follow. No pressure ...

Check it out.

 

Hot Air Meets Cold Air?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 829

2025-02-04

Can AI help us to understand why when politicians meet engineers, the result is not conducive to high standards and best practice?

It seems that it can, although progress may be dependent upon repeated questioning in order to tease out the full reasoning.

And of course, it depends which AI you choose to use. Fortunately, more AIs seem to be sprouting by the day, some with more specialist emphases. Time to dig in and get familiar?

Fulford White Dragon Report - Monday 3 February 2025

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 307

2025-02-04

Amid all the turmoil unleashed by the first few days of the "Trump Presidency" (I use quotation marks because I still think that there are plenty of grounds for disbelieving appearances), Ben brings us his views about much of the consequences that we have already read elsewhere, interwoven with quite a bit of sauce that we probably have not seen elsewhere or perhaps suspected.

Of course he may just be making educated guesses or he may have sources of information, but this week's report has much to interest us either way.

This onion still has more layers to be exposed ... (modest subscription required for full access).

 

2025 - Year of Disclosure?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 875

2025-02-02

This is an introduction to a complex problem - amid nuances galore, we discover that the real history of religion and the religious is obscured by (a) the churches and (b) our own indoctrination in matters historical, archeaological, political, and "scientific".

And all this from a man of the Cloth! From somebody so immersed in the theology of the Anglican Church, I find this is a very hopeful sign that the wholly artificial separation between scientific belief and religious belief that has been tacitly imposed throughout my lifetime is going to be bridged, and quite possibly in our time.

After all, science is simply "knowing the truth" - the truth cannot logically be compartmentalised into  religious or scientific. Are not the religious dogmas simply the scientific axioms upon which the edifice of religious theology is founded?

Trigger warning - you may need to cope with the possible upending of much of your world-view, and you should be prepared to make up your own mind on the basis of this and other evidence that you may be able to find.

No need to panic - it's OK to put it into the "too difficult" box for now. But if there is truth in it, then you will have been at least partially mentally prepared for any incoming revelations (so stay ahead with freecitizen.uk!).

But it will still ultimately be up to you to decide what you do, what you may, and what you don't believe. Nobody can do that for you.

(39 minutes)

 

Like/Dislike this video here.

NB: In many versions of the Bible, the word "Elohim" is routinely translated / interpreted as "God". In The Keys of the Kingdom Holy Bible, a recent translation based upon no particular variant of Christian dogma, this word is included "as is". In purely linguistic terms I'm told it is a plural form of a noun whose singular form is "El".  

Is there a link with Biblical names such as Angel, Abel, Samuel, Gabriel, Ezekiel, Michael, and no doubt others to numerous to repeat here? What would be the implications of such a link? I ask because I would quite like to know ...

What is Freedom?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 819

2025-02-02

Freedom is to have a choice about everything we do, with the proviso that we don't do anything to the detriment of the freedoms of others.

It is in effect freedom of choice. To choose where we go on holiday, to choose for whom we work, to choose our careers (should we be so fortunate as to understand what sort of career we both want and are suited for), to choose by mutual agreement those whom we will marry - or to choose celibacy.

Nobody doubts that of all these freedoms, some choices may actually be mutually incompatible (we in England cannot travel to the Isle of Man by train) but that's life. Some may turn out later to be incompatible (too many marriages do end in divorce) but the principle is that in the end there should be nobody to blame for our successes or failures but ourselves. We are here to make errors and to learn from them.

Of course governments of all hues and proclivities like to control (ie: limit) our freedoms so that we do what they want us to do, and they do that by passing statutes and inventing restrictions "for our safety".

Many of those restrictions are reasonable, as they help to prevent us from impacting on the freedoms of others - few would argue that anybody who hasn't learned the rules of the road and how to drive safely should be allowed to get behind the wheel of a double-decker bus. 

Many restrictions may seem designed to collect forfeits from the unwary (unduly low speed limits, and parking charges are a source of contention, to name but two).

Taxes are a primary restriction - you don't get to have any practical say on how the government spends this (quite large) part of your purchasing power on your behalf.

And now the government wants to extend their opportunity to control the other part of your purchasing power, that part that you do still get to spend or save according to your whim and fancy. They don't put it like that of course, but the direction of travel is clear - they will want to very substantially limit your choices to those of which they (the UN-WEF) approve. Who knows where that will end?

Give them an inch and they will take a mile. 

Which means that we have to learn from their mistakes, whilst they do not. That is not a recipe for progress.

 

Page 194 of 385