Free Citizen

2023-01-12

Barbara Boyd of Larouche PAC reviews a lot of US politics here, in quite a lot of detail that we in the UK may feel isn't of much direct interest to us.

But there's content here about the EU, the effect of Brexit on the British elite, and the relationships between the various US, UK (and Five Eyes) intelligence services.

Operation Mockingbird (Cold War) saw the clandestine takeover of the media by the intelligence agencies. If you think that didn't happen in the UK, you don't understand the "special relationship".

The Trump years saw the similar take-over of alternative media platforms, leading to the censorship of all non government-approved viewpoints, even from well qualified and experienced medical experts during the Covid crisis and indeed despite Elon's efforts, still ongoing.

On the plus side there's a great deal of useful information here, and includes how the US government has been using "Perception

2023-01-10

If you think you understand our world, then you are wrong.

Vaccines are matter for medical regulators, right?

Apparently not.

"the informed consent rules have been amended under Obama - subjects don't have to be informed of what's going on if it is deemed not in their best interests"

I wonder who does the deeming here?

We don't have any emergency but they keep extending it because they need it to bypass all the normal medical rules.

(17 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2023-01-10

We are all British in this country, whatever dreams of independence Nicola Sturgeon may harbour. 

And nobody says it better than that other redoubtable Scot, Neil Oliver.

Go ahead, cheer him on, he's worth every minute of every meticulously delivered rant.

(11 minutes)

2023-01-10

Barbara Boyd of LarouchePAC doesn't mince her words.

According to her, the "special relationship" between the USA and the UK was based upon cooperating intelligence services that ran the media, got their chosen politicians elected, and generally ran the two countries for their own ends.

All that fell apart when the Donald got elected in 2016.

In December 2018 the House of Lords published a report entitled "UK Foreign Policy in a Shifting World Order" complete with all the usual verbiage about the "Rules-Based International Order" but noting that the "special relationship" in it's then form might survive one term of Trump but not two. 

In 2023 we can now see how correct they were.

"... the Lords describe their second problem as populations in both the United States and Britain, who have been given too much access to information and believe “conspiracy” theories

2023-01-09

Once more Clayton Morris of Redacted brings us up to date with the machinations of the Great and the Good in the USA.

All out war with Russia? What could possibly go wrong?

(11 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-01-09

A most encouraging report from Ben today.

"Hungary has decided to leave the EU"

"... in the Middle East ... the Turkish and Israeli military join forces against the Satanic forces led by false Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu"

"In the United States, a final showdown between the Satanists and the white hat military is taking place at the Supreme Court"

"Let us start with the Russian offensive because it involves a 1.5 million-man Christian army marching straight into the Satanic headquarters in Western Europe"

Yes, nothing is as it seems. 

Maybe 2023 really will be the year that the world is changed.

2023-01-07

This is a huge topic but the reality is very simple - can we link the predicted "extreme weather" events (or even any predictions) to "climate change", and did those predictions come about?

Since the climate has been said to be changing for 50 odd years now, we should be able to point to some predictions that have indeed come about, and in view of the severity of the proposals put forward for combating this menace, we really ought to be able to point to some concrete evidence that (a) the predictions so far have been quite good and (b) we understand quite well how these predicted phenomena work.

In short, let's look at the evidence.

And by the way, models are not necessarily "science".

Models can only be regarded as scientific if they

2023-01-07

Doctors for Covid Ethics 5th Symposium - if it isn't here, it probably doesn't exist.

I won't attempt to summarise - suffice it to say that whatever you want to know, its here somewhere, and if it's not here then it's in an earlier symposium!

Wade in...

2023-01-07

As always, he makes the unanswerable case.

Our MPs are complicit in their absence. They are complicit in the ongoing fake vaccination programme, even though there is clearly no cause for it that has not been long discredited.

Will they be complicit in the next restrictions? 

We need to go back to first principles.

What will it take?

(15 minutes)

2023-01-07

It's possibly the most serious question of our age.

That there will be a reset seems certain.

Either it will be the WEF-UN Reset as envisioned by Klaus Schwab and we will all be subjugated into insect-eating human cyborgs, or those who would rule the world will be removed somehow or other. Various South American countries are showing the way, and the US patriots will no doubt strike at a time to suit their own situation. The US military are sworn to defend not the President, nor the Supreme Court, nor the Senate, nor the Congress, but the Constitution - and they abide by their own military law that predates the Civil Law.

So let's assume that the WEF-UN-Central-Bankers-Global-Corporates get taken down / collapse from bankruptcy, as seems likely.

With WEF-UN corporate puppets controlling every government, corporation, and "not-for-profit", when they all get removed what will happen?

...

2023-01-06

"Mr. Najadi, himself and his family fully jabbed and boostered, describes his realization that the entire narrative, especially regarding vaccine efficacy, is based on contradictions, misleading and unsupported claims and perhaps malicious intent"

"He trusts the Swiss judicial system, is confident that the Truth will come to light, and sends a message of hope that justice will indeed prevail"

Reiner Fuellmich continues his work with the ICIC.

"This is the most important case that I can imagine..."

(28 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-01-05

UK Column News brings us the update on Sodium Valproate, the epilepsy drug that when given in pregnancy is suspected of damaging the baby.

But don't worry that 20,000 are still taking it, it's under constant review.

And how have numbers of nurses gone up whilst the numbers of beds has gone down?

This is a broadcast that majors on the state of "our" NHS today, but there's space at the end for matters Ukrainian (at 49 minutes) and UK constitutional reform (at 75 minutes).

(84 minutes)

2023-01-05

There is no easy way to introduce this article.

I must simply let it speak for itself.

It behoves us all to understand how this kind of situation comes about, and we must be prepared to think the unthinkable if that is where the logic and the evidence takes us.

How many other towns have this problem?

How many agencies of the state are devoted to addressing these problems?

How much success are they having (download)?

One Nation Under Blackmail

2023-01-04

Like him or loathe him, he is one of the principle and most influential world leaders of today.

We would be wise to hear what he has to say.

(9 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-01-04

I can't believe that in England of all places I'm writing this headline, but perhaps the lunatics really are in charge of the asylum.

I'm not by myself - the level-headed evidence-based conservative press that still exists, albeit not the mainstream, is reporting the same.

First reports that I heard came from Canada, but it seems this is not confined to the Canadians.

Indeed, its roots may well go back to an establishment in the UK which some years ago came up with the Liverpool Care Pathway, subsequently dropped as completely unethical.

Still, if at first you don't succeed...

2023-01-04

The correlation between excess deaths and certain vaccine roll-outs has been asserted by a number of independent observers during 2022, only to be met by an extraordinary wall of silence from the official bodies who we have always assumed are charged with maintaining the health of the nations.

The first rule of statistics is that "correlation does not prove causation", although some may unhelpfully shorten that to the similar-sounding but fundamentally different "correlation is not causation". 

Correlation may well indicate causation - or it may not. Of itself it is unlikely to stand in a court of law as sole proof of causation, but it neither does it deny causation.

So from the point of view of a regulatory body, correlation warrants further investigation - no ifs, no buts.

Similar correlations across several nations enormously strengthens the case for further investigation.

...