2026-05-12

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Mark Attwood assists Rich to trace the links that may have brought our world to its current pass. Rich must think there's something in it because he keeps coming back for more... and why else would he risk his reputation as a serious commentator-interviewer?

It's absolutely outrageous, but could it be true? It's a perplexing question, and maybe there will never be any clear answers - or maybe clarity will come in a rush of revelations that will shock us to our cores.

(52 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2026-05-06

Firstly, apologies for the late posting this week - my browser refused to connect on Monday citing dangerous conditions. These appear now to have been corrected.

The news this week (according to Ben) is perhaps best summed up by the Q posts' assertion "the hunters have become the hunted". It's all to play for as nations globally turn against the military and economic might that previously dominated until Iran, global geopolitics, and blockaded oil supply chains brought it low.

Yes, we do indeed live in "interesting times"...

(If you don't like this narrative, there are others!)

Keep calm and carry on.

(

2026-05-05

The alliance of Big Government with Big Corporations is an inherently powerful beast that does all it can to ensure that we the people feel that we have to comply with its policies.

Those policies are presented as though they work in our favour, but if that were the case, what need for coercion? We would be queuing up for their product. Indeed, many do exactly that because we cannot believe that Big G and Big C could collaborate (illegally) against our interests - that would be preposterous. As indeed, it is.

The USA has taken coercion a long way in specific states, less far in others, with (weirdly) "religious exemptions" being a particular battlefront. In the UK (aside from Covid) we do seem to be free to disagree to a much greater extent than in the "land of the free" USA, but SPI-B turned out to be a dab hand at dishing out the psychological pressure to comply.

So whilst this article is probably more

2026-05-01

You couldn't make this stuff up, but fortunately for our entertainment Al Gore is still doing that for us.

So what happened to the "settled science"? Has it mysteriously become unsettled? Or is it Al's mental equilibrium that's at fault (he isn't getting any younger)? I think we should be told, before the men in white coats are detailed to deal with the problem. We can't have "Climate Science" bedevilled with this sort of uncertainty, as judging by the total lack of any predictions that turned out to be trueso far, it's in enough trouble already.

2026-04-27

Apparently the end is nigh, but not quite yet as the confusion is still rampant and sense and calm have still to be regained.

What has actually happened, is still happening, and is still to happen seems to be anybody's guess, so read Ben's report and believe what you will.

This seems to be a time for securing one's own family, peace of mind, and prospects as best one may.

2026-04-06

Maybe Central Casting is having to work overtime.

Plenty to get one's teeth into in this episode of the End of the World that We Once Knew.

What to believe? Your guess is as good as mine, but the outstanding truth appears to be that the Israeli-US axis of war is getting the worst of the "negotiations" with Iran, and Russia retains its position as possibly the most sane and consistent power on the planet.

Of course it could all be a vast Movie...   and perhaps the longest running production of our civilisation. It does seem to have that quality of real unrealism that good movies trade on, and certainly enough suspense to keep us on the edge of our seats.

Let us pray that no actors were harmed in its making...  (modest subscription required for full

2026-04-06

This is one where medical bureaucrats maybe really do place a tick in a box.

But is there a vaccine for it? Tricky this - if it's spread by ticks then will a face-mask suffice in crowded pubs (as public spaces will come to be called in the absence of the real thing)?

Will the bureaucrats all be guilty of spreading the disease without knowing it? Will further pandemic measures have to be invented to stop them?

And how could we survive the agonising wait for a vaccine, even if developed at warp speed, in our modern bureaucracy-ridden society? 

Indeed, how could a properly-regulated vaccine ever be developed without a veritable orgy of box-ticking?

Something will have to give.

Sit down before you read

2026-04-02

Following on from our recent article Could You Put Assumed Authority in its Rightful Place? which might help to deal with an unlawful legal challenge, there is scope for some companion article along the lines of "Could You Challenge your Medical Treatment Plan?". Most people (myself included prior to 2000) simply assume that "doctor knows best", but is that true?

It has always been problematic to me that it is illegal for anybody (except our NHS of course) to claim that they can cure cancer. How then is a cure to be found? Only by contributing to cancer research charities, who have been researching fruitlessly for my entire lifetime - perhaps if they had started looking elsewhere than in our wallets they might have had more success.

Then I developed urticaria and subsequently asthma. To be met with prescriptions for steroids /  inhalers that suppressed

2026-04-03

"He contended that the concentration of land ownership was the primary mechanism by which wealth extracted from productive labour accumulated in the hands of those who produced nothing"

Our readers who follow investment matters may recognise association with the 18½ year Real Estate Cycle which links the rise in real estate values with preceding investments in infrastructure. This link was recognised by 1879 when "Henry George published 'Progress and Poverty', an examination of why economic depressions occurred and why poverty persisted alongside industrial growth" 

For some reason the Education Curriculum taught in American schools prior to 1901 was changed to exclude not only this information... but how the problem might be avoided by a change to shift the burden of taxation to those who had actually accumulated the wealth to pay it.

No

2026-03-31

Plenty, one might think, given the growing scepticism about "pandemics", their "partnership" with the WEF, their funding from Big Pharma (eg: the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and their GAVI vaccine interests) and the cessation of funding from the United States of America.

Plus the odd lawsuit that seem to be proliferating in the USA and the Netherlands to call the industry to account.

The Brownstone Institute suspects that all things considered, the time is now right for a significant level of reform to be agreed upon so that its role for the future can be more in line with its original objectives, rather than the consolidation of medical control under a centralised global body that accepts too much funding (and associated conflicts of interest) from corporate bodies (and their affiliated "charitable foundations") and exerts too much authority over national medical issues whilst

2026-03-28

Del Bigtree has been at the forefront of the movement to call Big Pharma and the medical "regulators" to account, via his Highwire and ICAN journalist platforms.

Following in the footsteps of Dr Andrew Wakefield, who was the first high-profile doctor to challenge the prevailing vaccine orthodoxy that I recall (largely because my wife and I had discussions about vaccinating our own kids at the time) and was roundly vilified for it, Del was perhaps the first major journalist to mount an independent publicly funded challenge to one of the biggest industrial groupings of our time - one might describe it as the pharmaceutical-medico-industrial-regulatory complex. Or perhaps more accurately the pharmaceutical-medico-industrial-regulatory-BillandMelindaGatesFoundation complex.

Del was led by the Universe to appoint up-coming lawyer Aaron Siri to depose the "godfather of vaccination", Stanley Plotkin, in a

2026-03-25

** BAD TASTE WARNING

The Epstein files have brought us into the era of epic bad taste. It's upon us. Get used to it.
My attitude is that I will avoid bad taste except where it seems particularly appropriate. You don't have to agree, but be assured that I will minimise it overall whilst not always shying away from it.

As is as about as predictable as tomorrow morning, the powers that shouldn't be are working on the next BIG THING that they hope will scare the Bejasus out of us and have us begging for something - anything - even a lockdown - complete with panoply of confusing contradictory bureaucratic rules and meaningless moronic restrictions - to delight the compliant-to-a fault and the tell-me-what-to-dos who will in turn delight in shaming the rest of us into all-numbing limbo because otherwise "WE ARE ALL GONNA DIE!" because either there's another DEADLY but totally novel virus that nobody knows anything about (except that it's

2026-03-16

It does seem to be rather more than the end of the beginning.

Netanyahu gone, Israel in collapse, US servicemen refusing suicidal (and no doubt illegal) orders as they are duty bound to do, the war in the Gulf is ending in defeat of the US-Israel mafiosi that has ruled the West since at least as far back as the private banking mafia set up the Federal Reserve in 1913, following the sinking of the "Titanic". Trump has taken it down by setting up against an Iran that had prepared for exactly this conflict over many years.

Time will tell what role Trump actually played here, but his actions seem to have enabled Netanyahu to take on the final impossible battle that would destroy the rogue state of Israel.

How the US will recover its poise after this remains to be seen, but if Israel is gone then the way is clear  to remove most of the Senate and Congress by whatever means necessary, but that may be a messy business.

Rich Does Conspiracy Theories!

2026-03-06

The story of the last century (and indeed longer) has been of the ever-onward march of those who would rule the world, and who will stoop to any depths to achieve their aims.

Deceit? What's a little white lie when it advances the cause? Besides, it's necessary if we want to persuade the proletariat that they are doing the right thing for the greater good - our good.

War? No problem - bring in the profits! No need to concern ourselves with the ensuing human misery, it will be forgotten soon enough.

Democracy? Useful for keeping the unsuspecting masses in check, diverted, and too busy with their own lives to worry about ours. Besides, politics (like football) keeps them entertained, and even lets them think that they can control us by voting harder! 

Law and Justice? Essential for keeping the lid on our own illegal but very entertaining activities - we don't want just anybody with a conscience investigating

2026-03-02

Anthropology.

Does this key unlock the problem?

The Daily Sceptic reviews the book: Professor Alison Shaw’s 1980s fieldwork on the Pakistani community of Oxford.

A logical evaluation of the results of indiscriminate immigration.

21:03:45

This is a new topic for Alex Krainer, with whom we are familiar for his expertise in geopolitics.

But this is all about the current parlous state of British "politics".

That he thinks this is huge is significant.

(36 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-03-01

The Daily Express Reports.

(12 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-24

Graham Moore of the English Constitution Party discusses the state of English politics in the wake of the Rupert Lowe phenomenon.

Whether we agree with him or not, he raises some very pertinent questions that need to be addressed.

It's not a question of right or wrong, it's a question of how we want to structure our British Isles for the future.

After all, in the past the separations were largely determined by our differing historical political and religious backgrounds, but provided we can all achieve comparable freedoms, does it really matter whether we end up as a "united kingdom" or as separate independent nations united in brotherhood?

Given the modern trend toward ever greater levels of communications of all types, I'm not sure that I would lose too much sleep over the distinction, although unpicking the current entanglement of deliberately obfuscated constitutions in the most beneficial way will be a

2026-02-23

As it appears impossible to know who is on whose side these days, Ben in his analysis may be as close to the truth as anybody.

There's a lot of information in his full report this week, including about the situation in the UK. As always, we may expect the secret services to tell him what they want us to believe, so is the info kosher? (define kosher... )

It's a mixed bag that doesn't divide neatly along recognised lines.

And is Elon really an alien? Or just another distraction?

Modest subscription required for full access...