2026-02-19
Mike Yeadon was one of the very first to call out the Covid hoax back in the day when everyone was hit by simultaneous whammies seemingly out of a clear blue sky. He was one of the authors of a joint paper pointing out that the Covid Test, relied upon by all and sundry to finger almost everybody as a Covid victim, wasn't remotely up to the task that we naively thought had been assigned to it - namely, to identify cases of the disease.
The more conspiratorial amongst us thought that it was actually perfectly designed to achieve the task assigned to it - it's just that we realised that the task assigned was to persuade a gullible public that there was a pandemic rampant by fingering as many people as possible (especially those likely to die soon anyway) with a false positive diagnosis. They needed "Covid deaths" and were prepared to fake them.
Once that suspicion took hold and we realised that all the rule changes put in place had the effect of pointing in the exact same direction, and that no authority was taking a blind bit of notice about any such complaints, let alone deigning to answer them in a serious manner, it was but a very short step to recognising the extreme likelihood of a scam of epic proportions.
The scam however has now morphed into a serious power-play where the gullible will be herded into 15-minute cities, there to be confined under a social scoring regime, ostensibly to track our carbon footprint and any other "measure" that the powers that would coerce us care to dream up to deny us our freedom. Like the fake Covid Test, these "measures" don't need to be actually measured, they just need to be believed to some small extent. In any case, once they control our spending via a CBDC we won't be able to argue with the "computer-says-no-at-point-of-sale" situation even if we could prove it wrong.
These things won't have to be either proven or realistic, they just need to be enforceable ... and the CBDC provides that enforcement at point of would-be purchase.
