Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2022-10-30

Wear masks, don't wear masks, lock down, don't lock down, social distance etc etc.

Now the Daily Sceptic tells us how those who hope we have short memories are trying to spin away the blame.

It wasn't the non-pharmaceutical interventions that did the damage, but the fear of the virus ... so it was our fault for believing the incessant fear-mongering?

If this wasn't published in a reputable journal (!) I would think it a well-timed way over-the-top outrageous spoof, but these days one has to move with the times and recognise that what passes for politics is actually just attempted mind-control. If the peasants are revolting against it, then mind-control harder!

Or have I flipped and become mentally incoherent in a totally unwarranted search for the last vestiges of sanity, where sanity is not to be found?

If the objective is to make us all confused and suggestible, then we must become coherent and argumentative!

"Does anyone honestly think these people would be arguing that lockdowns didn’t happen, or that it’s impossible to measure their effects, if the policy had been a success?"

To be fair to the author Michael Senger, he's done a cracking job of demolishing these absurdities, but the fact that he felt it necessary to publish such an article speaks volumes about today's world.

This is not yet over.