2022-07-19
John Rappaport has been wrestling the nature of the incoming fully automated matrix for years. Here he illustrates the growing nature of the beast in terms that we can understand, neither blinding us with tech nor pulling any punches.
He does make a lot of assumptions about the effectiveness of the tech + AI monolith, but technical problems are made to be resolved and its only a matter of time, development, testing, and fine-tuning.
Of course the scope for technical error is enormous - but if you are arguing with a machine, the outcome isn't normally success for the human. One can only imagine being suddenly confined to one's cubicle because the system has mistaken someone else for you and punished you for that someone else's misdemeanours. And the elite who have constructed the control grid to serve their purposes are unlikely to be interested in resolving your difficulties with it.
Even were it technically possible to investigate and make corrections, there would never be enough "service desk" operatives because they would need the ability to get into the system and override it - an ability that would be reserved for a tiny few lest it got out of hand ...
Computer says "no" would mean "no" - and no questions permitted.
