Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2024-02-15

Personally I'm pretty fed up with the unstoppable folk at the WHO (and the UN and their multiple associated agencies and corporate associates with massive vested interests). It's high time they met with the irresistible force of mass non-compliance.

Their incessant obsession about pandemics and their supposed expertise giving them sole untrammelled authority to

(a) identify and declare a pandemic and
(b) dictate the interventions that we must all submit to in order to survive it

are become frankly boring. The are boring precisely because the WHO etc are impervious to rational argument, and push on with the same old same old regardless of all logical persuasion.

Their claim to be worthy of such powers can be refuted by simple logic in a few lines:

  1. They are (we must assume and assert) human, and humans are infamous for their propensity to make errors, as well as for their potential to be corrupted. Any one human or human-based body corporate cannot be relied upon - especially those with potential conflicts of interest. Yes, a large portion of WHO funding comes from Big Pharma and their associates.

  2. If by any unlikely chance a pandemic should actually strike, and the WHO should take a wrong turn and fail to prescribe the correct responses (remember - they are allegedly human) then by their own logic it will sweep the world and millions / billions may die.

  3. If on the other hand the medical people in each country (ideally down to each clinic and surgery) would be free to devise and adopt their own solutions, and the WHO would limit itself to monitoring and reporting their results, then the best proven solutions would quickly emerge and would be adopted elsewhere.

But by now we all "know" that saving lives is not the name of the game.

How do we know?

Since we haven't had any genuine pandemic for at least a century (and probably much longer), it is very clear that their focus on pandemics isn't motivated by any genuine evidence for one incoming any time soon (other than unsupported assertions from such as Bill Gates).

And for those that say "Ah, but what about Covid-19?" I say "a genuine pandemic would cause excess deaths aplenty - at least enough to show up in the statistics (if not then is it worth worrying about?). 

A significant level of excess deaths (from all causes) did not show up in the statistics until after the vaccine roll-out - and prompted interest from neither governments nor the WHO (so are they actually concerned for our welfare?). 

For those pedants who still cry "but the tests showed that Covid was everywhere" and "Covid deaths were very visible in the statistics" I say "the WHO itself noted that the PCR test was susceptible to false positives (especially in "low incidence" populations - such as the asymptomatic, who were being tested left right and centre) and 'Covid' was listed as cause of death merely on the basis of a positive PCR test, regardless of other factors. I could add that the PCR test was never actually proven to identify the Covid virus, and that at the height of the Covid scare, flu deaths had virtually disappeared ... make of that what you will.

Quod erat demonstrandum.

Still, for those that want to know more (and risk terminally entangling themselves in the weeds of all the history of "pandemic preparedness", etc etc), dive in here.