Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2021-01-31

A few days ago the headlines were full of the news:-

"100,000 dead in the UK from coronavirus"

The death-toll attributed to the Covid pandemic in the UK was on every masthead, and Boris was said to be "deeply sorry".

Fast forward to today and we learn that the Government has published its December assessment of the impacts of both Covid the disease and the Covid suppression measures (with exclusions).

I don't recall seeing any headlines about this report, but the figures are equally important even if Boris hasn't expressed his public contrition for them.

As we might expect it is quite complex, but in an effort to make it more digestible I summarise below some of the findings in terms of "excess deaths" (table 2 on page 8 of the main report) as follows:

Category Excess Deaths due to: Mar - Sep 2020 Oct-Feb 2021 Long Term < 50 yrs Total
A Attributed to Covid 50,000 70,000   120,000
B Lack of NHS Critical Care        
C1 Changes to Emergency Care 4,000 10,000   14,000
C2 Changes to Adult Social Care 10,000 22,000   32,000
C3 Changes to Elective Care 0 0 18,200 18,200
C4 Changes to Primary/Community Care 0      
D1 Benefit to the Wider Population -2,300 -2,100   -4,400
D2 Impacts from Recession     40,000 40,000
  Non-Covid Totals 11,700 29,900 58,200 99,800
  All Inclusive Totals 61,700 99,900 58,200 219,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes:

  • Blank items were not quantified (and not necessarily zero)
  • D2 includes impacts of "Mental health, musculoskeletal disorders, cardiovascular disease, disease and ‘other’" due to the economic fall-out.

Clearly there are many gaps in the above table, and in the scale of things item D1 is a rounding error, but we can see that the "non-Covid" deaths are likely to exceed those attributed to Covid by some margin once the blanks are filled in.

If the deaths primarily due to co-morbidities were to be stripped out as well, then we would likely see a very different picture.

The report maintains that the situation would have been much worse had no or minimal non-pharmaceutical interventions been brought in, but that ignores the studies that conclude that lock-downs are ineffective at suppressing Covid deaths. It notes a possible "additional 76,000 excess deaths for COVID-19 patients as a result of worsened outcomes due to lack of NHS capacity".

Given that project Cygnus concluded as long ago as 2016 that NHS capacity was completely inadequate to cope with a pandemic (they modelled influenza, but that's not dissimilar), I would suggest that this supports the view that these draconian lock-downs resulted at least in part from the total failure of the government and NHS to provide sufficient capacity to remedy the shortcomings identified by Cygnus.