EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.


If it looks too good to be true, it probably is.

It's an old adage, but an adage that has stood the test of time.

Will "the vaccine" stand the test of time?

Drs Wodarg and Yeadon don't like what they see and "filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42)."

Good luck with that one - as time passes and we study the statistics we can see that the pandemic is primarily political rather than medical in nature, which to my tainted mind almost certainly means that no good will come of it.

One might be forgiven for thinking that if a vaccine has already been approved for roll-out then the trials would already be completed and full trials reports and analyses would be published and accessible, but apparently not.

Do read the article - it outlines the grounds upon which the doctors base their application. These are simple enough for most of us to understand.

Mysteriously or accidentally the link in the article to the application document returns a "not found" error, and a quick look at the EMA web-site was not sufficient for me to find it on there either, so I don't know what happened to it. Nevertheless other articles reported the same story and I downloaded the petition from https://www.wodarg.com (you can too) so it does seem to be genuine.

You can read what the EMA has to say about the Pfizer vaccine approval here.