EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.


TransVision 2021 - Spain, October 8th - 10th

Gadgetry on steroids - and we will be part of it.

The question is, which part? Will we be pulling the strings or will we be puppets, with our strings pulled by the globalists' AI algorithms?

Joe Allen writes for the Federalist, describing transhumanism as

"a futuristic religion that exalts technology as its highest power"

Commandments 1 to 3 of 10:

  1. I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me"

  2. You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My Commandments

  3. You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.

Can the bits and bytes of an AI algorithm be considered to be "a carved image"? An image carved upon the memory systems in a computer network?

Can those who devise the AI algorithms be said to be taking His name in vain?

I think that we have been warned. To create such a system would be an act of supreme insult to "the one true God" who created the universe, the world and everything in it. 

It would cut off humanity from God's ordained purpose, from the natural processes of evolution and spiritual development. It would be a supremely arrogant act of repudiation.

You would not have to be a Christian to think in this way. As the Bard put it:

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy"

Even in his day, the world had its proto-transhumanists!

Step forward all the other religions on earth, past and present, who believe in a (benevolent) supreme architect.

Even if we do not accept the religious aspects, do we really want to step backwards into the bondage offered by an all-encompassing AI system, where our every movement would be controlled by the AI of the elites to minimise our carbon footprint, and anything else that they might frown upon, such as free thinking?

The current levels of censorship and media control across the world are telling pointers to the direction in which this would lead us, and the manic determination to inject us all with who-knows-what by whatever means available indicates an obsessive need to control us all.

I don't think that we should ignore TransVision 2021.

Sooner or later, we will have to choose to be for it, or against it. Sooner might be better ...




Dr Ryan Cole MD (pathologist, immunologist, virologist) tells it like it is. 

"The spike is the toxin""we see a 200 times increase in myocarditis in our society right now"

"this is a poisonous attack on our population and it needs to stop now"

"... cannot find that for which they do not look"

"Billions of dollars spent on advertising ... where's the funding for real science?"

"Where are the autopsies?"

"They don't want you to see what we're seeing"

"the shots dysregulate your immune response"

"I have seen a 10 to 20 fold increase in uterine cancer in the last six months in my laboratory"



Once More Stew Peters burnishes his credentials as a global interviewer by taking on the features of the NHS App.

Some thought that it would be expanded to cover a lot more than our health, but here already?

Stew tells it like he sees it:



"In fact, it’s just plain stupid. And breathtakingly so"

"But the worst thing about this plan is that it will do virtually nothing to improve the climate while it destroys much of the free-market economy"

"In fact, what is coming to pass was best forewarned by late economist and Nobel laureate Friedrich von Hayek in his seminal 1944 work The Road to Serfdom"

Yes, it's another article critical of "green" energy policies, and well worth reading, not for the green/ungreen arguments but for the unspoken assumptions upon which these arguments are put forward. 

Well, they are spoken of now, and the AIER has done us a service in reminding us all that these arguments are not and never were about keeping the planet cool. They are about staying free - free to think for ourselves, free to argue the case (even when utterly wrong-headed - how else will the wrong-headed test their beliefs and be free to improve or discard those that don't stand up to scrutiny?).

Free to disagree and to argue for a better world. Free to be wrong as well as free to be right. But most of all, free to decline the coercive control of those who set themselves up as our rulers, and free to trust the individual choices of the people themselves to determine the future.

"an authority directing the whole economic system of the country would be the most powerful monopolist conceivable"

Well, Hayek had the principle right, but not quite the detail ...  we don't today face a national monopoly power, we face a global monopoly power.

The bigger they come, the harder they fall!



Covid is polarising opinion.

Those who trust the authorities and the NHS, and those who half-trust them but find the idea that they are actively acting against the population impossible to accept, these are on one side of the argument.

Those observers who have watched the systematic overturning of good science and good statistical process for no good reason, along with the implicit chorus of "we are scientists and we say so" coming from official advisers in the face of medical practitioners 'at the coal face' around the world who are telling them that they have got it wrong. These observers are on the other side.

Add to this mix the blatant censorship of views that contradict officialdom, add to this the blatant campaigns of fear that were and are being waged by governments to terrify us all into compliance with ever-changing rules and saturation advertising, add to these the use of force to ensure compliance in various countries, and we can see why the authorities are increasingly losing the support of their populations.

Use of coercion tells us that they know they have lost the argument.

So where does the truth lie?

This article presents a number of videos and linked articles that taken in turn explain why many are now convinced that the world's governments are either stupid and ignorant, or criminally complicit in a great global scam called Covid.

There is no attempt at balance here. The scam has gone too far for that, and anyway, it would make this article too long. We will not even attempt to answer the question "why?" - it's not really necessary, since we can be sure that no scam works to the advantage the scammed.

The first video is a quick overview of a complex situation, but it's very clear what is going on. Follow the money, follow the influence, follow the conflicts of interest. Then tell me how it constitutes independent oversight:


Do you think this sort of thing doesn't affect the UK?

Now we must consider both the virus and the "vaccines" - which are not in fact vaccines as they used to be known.

The death statistics have been very clearly manipulated from the beginning of the pandemic to attribute as many deaths as possible to the virus (PHE: any death within 28 days of a positive test result - even if the patient "fell under a bus" - oh, and no autopsies, so no challenge possible).

Supporting evidence comes from the statistics of 'excess deaths from all causes' for most of Europe and the UK for 2020. In a pandemic of this scale, these deaths should tell the story, and they do. The excess deaths from all causes reported by Public Health England (and Euromomo for Europe) did not show any pandemic-sized increase in deaths for 2020. No great surprise if indeed flu and much else besides had simply been rebadged as "Covid". 

The accuracy of the RT/PCR test itself has long been disputed and the WHO in Jan 2020 released an advisory that the test by itself cannot be relied upon, as it can produce false positives, especially when used in a population where the disease prevalence is rare (for example, in the general asymptomatic population). This would seem to totally discredit our government's mantra of "test test test".

Note that 2021 is a different ball-park - wide-spread "vaccination" had begun and continued throughout. Did the "vaccines" cause deaths in 2021? Not according to any official sources - even the MHRA yellow card system doesn't appear to be being used by the MHRA for any follow-up action. All we have are more deaths classed as "Covid", and we have already remarked how those figures are skewed.

The "vaccines" are novel gene-editing inoculations whose stated purpose is to modify our cell's DNA to persuade them to express a "spike protein" that is foreign to the human body. It is also apparently toxic to blood, which has obvious ramifications to all parts of the body including all the vital organs. Whilst these infected cells remain active, it also sets up the body for an auto-immune response against the continuing production of spike proteins.

Like all real vaccines, they also contain toxic adjuvants designed to provoke the immune system, and reportedly other ingredients not fully declared in the official documentation (metal contaminants have been found, graphene oxide has been alleged (& this video is subtitled in English).

And now, microscopic examination has identified what appears to be hydra:

Now I'm not saying that the hydra thing is true, and I'm not saying it's untrue - but the assertion is "out there" and I do believe that the vaccination drive is in pursuit of an undisclosed malign global agenda.

Until we have a full independent analysis of these vaccines, we don't know, but we can keep such assertions in mind.

More work needs to be done, and it won't be done by the vaccine manufacturers . . .

So how did the politics of Covid stack up in the fount of these various "vaccines", the USA?

Stew Peters takes the Trump administration to task:


It's hard to disagree.

"The push now by Pfizer is to vaccinate children 5-11"

Whatever you may think of any of the above, the totally unknown long-term safety risk of these injections, the almost unknown but likely significant short-term safety risk, coupled with zero benefit of "vaccination" in this age group, should in a sane world mean peremptory rejection. It doesn't, our world is sane no longer.

I predict that Pfizer will be given some form of authorisation. Where Pfizer leads, the other "vaccine" companies will follow. Where the CDC/FDA leads, the MHRA will follow.

The danger is that this programme is going to make the thalidomide tragedy look like a trivial event.