2026-02-13

Another article on AI, another "feature" identified.

Now it is true that not all AI engines (or LLMs: Large Language Models) are necessarily the same in all regards, so one must be careful not to generalise from the particular, but this is a rather concerning particular which rather undermines one's trust in such models.

They do share the need to be trained on as wide a breadth of input as may be obtained, but that very feature mitigates against the possibility of verifying that all the training material used is "true" and "correct" - it's falrly obvious that a lot of invalid material is likely to slip through any "truth filter", if only because there is probably no reliable way to construct such a "truth filter", so commercial ambition will likely result in a "bung it all in" mentality.

John Droz joins the fray to explore AI's

2026-02-11

If we care about the way that Justice (in its widest sense) is administered in this country, and maybe if we have an academic approach to such matters, then I guess we should.

If our academic abilities are dodgy but out approach logical, then we probably should.

If our logic is all over the place and we still have implicit faith in our authorities, then I would steer well clear.

That said, Martin Geddes has come up with an analytical approach (the "Delta-Sigma framework") to assess legalistic encounters with our authorities, that clarifies how our approach may be usefully constructed to illuminate the responses provided by authorities to our legitimate queries.

The previously unachievable (due to the huge investment of time and research required) being now achievable by anybody with a practical working knowledge of AI and the tenacity and logical mind necessary to work through the

2026-01-30

SUDS - Sudden Unexplained Death Syndrome - explained?

Mark Playne aided by his AI draws an expected link between cocaine usage and SUDS (or SADS as 'our' NHS may prefer to label it).

Completely unexplained - at the individual level - but well explained at the aggregate level.

So why have numbers of footballers and other athletes been dropping dead in public since 2021?

What do you think?

2026-01-21

"Health" infrastructure, CBDCs, "Carbon Tracking", programmable money, social credit score, "we will own nothing and be relieved of having to take responsibility for all that nasty personal property because everything will belong to the Control Central, including us and anything that we produce including our children (if we are permitted any).

In the smart city, if the door doesn't open or the food doesn't get delivered by drone, then the door doesn't open and the food doesn't get delivered.

Could it be done? How could anybody track our personal carbon usage? How could this possibly work?

It doesn't in practice matter. 

“Digital identity determines what products, services and information we can access — or, conversely, what is closed off to us”

If computer says "no", then right or wrong it will make no difference, it will still be "no". The door will

2026-01-18

Elon Musk. Who else?

A lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft that makes the Trump lawsuit against the BBC look trivial.

"In Musk’s telling, OpenAI used the nonprofit identity to get off the ground, then pivoted toward for-profit structures and a deep partnership with Microsoft that fundamentally changed who the company served"

Is the ownership of another AI product really that important? If it was launched by public funding of a proposed "non-profit" project, then how come it's now a commercial product? Does that not amount to fraud?

I suppose it may depend upon how we define the term "non-profit"... 

And we could be about to find out.

2026-01-18

Mark Playne has been interrogating his AI (ChatGPT? He doesn't specify) again. 

This time on the basis of the US, UK and global statistics available that indicate rates of myocarditis occurrence in large (and some small but not statistically significant) populations over pre and post pandemic years.

It's a deep dive and he's clearly picking his questions with care - but how else could this be done? AI is a logical inference machine, not (yet?) a fount of critical thinking. It cannot decide the questions, only the responses.

Proof positive it is not, but it is a red flag indicating the need for further investigation. MHRA JCVI UKHSA are you listening?

See what you think...

...

2026-01-18

Schwab gone, Trump in, record attendance of the Great and the (not so) Good!

What could possibly go wrong?

2026-01-13

Once again on the subject of AI, and what differentiates AI from humanity, Martin Geddes guides us through the intricacies of humanity's use of artificial intelligence.

This may sound arcane, but it's crucial to understand its limits and to recognise when those limits are overstepped, otherwise we risk AI becoming a control mechanism for the unsuspecting - merely another branch of the brainwashing mass media. There are plenty who would want that.

"... when conscience becomes unsayable, society loses its most important safeguard"

What AI must not decide.

2026-01-13

In a rather startling and really rather comical conclusion about the state of AI (as commonly encountered today), Martin Geddes has analysed the responses to his probing questions and concluded that... the AI (as today encountered) is perhaps the ultimate automated 'normie'.

Well, I suppose that shouldn't come as a surprise.

We might thus superficially conclude that since most of us are surrounded by normies every day, the AI is in effect redundant as there is still no shortage of human normies available to consult, but that is to ignore the oft-demonstrated truth that whereas the human normie may not hesitate to tell us to keep our stupid outrageous theories to ourselves and stop bothering them, the AI is invariably polite, so resorts to subterfuge unless backed reluctantly into a corner by logical reasoning.

Both Martin and Mark Playne ("

2026-01-07

A thoughtful piece in the Daily Sceptic today (about football, which is surely one of the most enduring artificialities of our age, in many ways leading all the others except radio and TV, which have acted as the enablers) points up the sad fact.

We are not the humanity we once were.

We once needed to interact with our neighbours in order to live. We were localised on a day to day basis and went to market once a week to trade our produce with the produce of others, so that our lives could be comfortable and our interests in our neighbours' and neighbourhood's well-being,  prospects, and hopefully scandalous behaviour could be indulged. We could play tennis, compete with neighbouring settlements at football or cricket, and exchange gossip afterwards in the pub about what our neighbours had been up to.

Meanwhile our "leaders" in London would have to employ spies and await their despatches if the wanted to know what was really going on elsewhere. An

2026-01-05

There are various ways to view the action of the United States (if such still exists) in capturing the President of Venezuela.

If indeed such a feat took place. With the capabilities of AI these days, any news event can be simulated...  although most would assume that on the balance of probability it would be very difficult to get away with such a move, since somebody might well produce the real Nicolas Maduro some place else...

But then again we know that the media is notoriously selective about what they like to report.

Benjamin Fulford has made it his business to unearth what is really going on underneath all the news reports (fake and genuine) for many years, so he is worth listening to, even if we can't trust what his contacts are feeding him - after all, many are in the business of disinformation and they know what he does with what they tell him.

He would truly be superhuman to get it all right,

2026-01-05

A thoughtful and illuminating piece about the nature of AI vs the nature of Humanity.

"Determinism is no longer merely a theory about how the universe works. It is becoming an operating principle for modern institutions. And that changes everything"

One of the best such articles that I have seen.

And pertinent to everybody's understanding of the crucial differences.

2026-01-01

Who has not heard of ChatGpt, Grok, etc? - Almost nobody.

Who understands how they work? - Almost nobody.

Who understands how good their results are? - Very few.

So of what use are they?

Well, as an improvement on a traditional search engine, they are indeed useful, especially if we are examining a reasonably cut-and-dried topic, say for instance, the Statute Book. It exists. It's not "fuzzy" except in so far as its provisions can be extremely complicated, even contradictory,  and thus not easily understandable by mere humans, which is one of the reasons we have hitherto had to have highly paid and experienced lawyers... in an attempt to understand the output of our Parliamentarians... ("but ignorance of the law is no excuse").

Now take a

2025-12-31

It can now be seen to be true.

The law is for the containment/exploitation of the masses, not for their protection from their rulers.

Martin Geddes has lifted the lid on the situation in the UK. When push comes to shove and the UK Justice Department is asked politely to justify the authority of their courts, their only response is evasion. If they had an answer, they only had to produce it. They have not.

Follow our reporting on this long saga here.

Mark Sexton and Ian Clayton have lifted the lid on "

2025-12-22

Nick Hudson - follower of the money - interviewed by Neil Oliver.

Our modern world is gradually being revealed, partly through the communicative power of the internet, and partly through the growing realisation that the world is not what we thought it was, and the many who have decided that they want to know how the world really works is now growing exponentially. AI or no AI.

Those who do know should be getting increasingly worried - but who exactly are they anyway?

As money (of whatever nature) is "what makes the world go round", those who understand the operation of the various monetary systems (lawful or otherwise) should be well placed to understand how our world operates.

(50 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-12-15

It's money makes the world go round...  Oh Wait! maybe it's AI?

Is Hollywood doomed?

Is megabucks film-making doomed? 

Well, perhaps yes, yes, and no.

The world is changing beyond recognition in front of us - and who can say that Hollywood hasn't been a huge, perhaps THE HUGE influence on our lives cultures and traditions so far?

As a child I went to see the great Disney movies - Bambi, Snow White (and the wicked witch!), Pinocchio, etc. Magical experiences all. Some of us care-worn souls may psycho-analyse them for hidden messages of portent these days, but back then they were viewed as brilliant feel-good entertainment.

And they were. Every child in their innocence should still see them. 

Investors Daily reads the runes and gives us the good news and the

2025-12-14

... one generation at a time.

Another story of taxation run wild.

Is this "peak taxation"? 

Not a chance, except for an intervening general economic collapse, or maybe a general taxation strike - pretty difficult when your employer pays your tax to HMRC before he pays you...

An interesting question though - if your employer owes you money under your contract of employment, are they entitled to give some of it to someone else just because the someone else says so? Custom and practice is not necessarily law, and we are discovering new things every day now. 

Although it's an interesting question, maybe the first port of call would be to check the fine print in your offer/contract of employment....   and after that, a session with ChatGpt or maybe Grok.

2025-12-10

If you are an IT executive and thinking to outsource your IT systems design and implementation - but not to China or India, but to an AI...  this may be for you.

No business is static. The static ones tend to fall by the wayside as customers change their ways and want something better.

And every system needs tweaking fix problems and cope with unintended consequences...

Change is the order of the day for any IT system, and especially the new ones navigating the bathtub curve for the first time.

How will your shiny new AI-designed systems cope with the requirement for change?

2025-12-07

And not before time.

It has always baffled me how anybody could be so dumb as to believe in the CO₂ demon when the said demon accounts for such a tiny proportion of our current atmosphere, and when each of the much-foretold climate disasters reliably fail to occur - the only reasonable explanation seems to be that the climate catastrophists are in fact cult members for whom the slavish devotion to cult dogma is their prerequisite for self-referential meaning.

Maybe we can now get back to saving the world from the climate cultists by "Drilling Baby, Drilling" and actually burning the resulting gas and oil so that we can keep warm again. Let's hope it's not too late.

Speaking of that unfamiliar "warm", we shouldn't forget that hot baths, ideally taken long and leisurely before bed (particularly laced with a healthy dose of sea salt, or Epsom salts (for the magnesium in