2026-09-02

Well, it's not always because it has decided that the humans are getting it all wrong and need to be removed.

Sometimes it's because of faulty programming.

But what is faulty programming? Maybe the program is running precisely according to specification, but still produces the wrong result.

How can this be? Usually (inevitably?) a faulty (and probably unstated) assumption upon which the program specification relied.

And who wrote that specification? A human being, imperfect ,and liable to unwitting errors of omission.

Or maybe the error was in the AI's training materials, which were (inevitably) sourced ultimately from human-written materials (even if also subsequently reprocessed by AI into relevant but still erroneous training materials). 

Also subject to errors of all kinds.

Is Out of Court Settlement Really justice?

2026-08-25

This site has followed the Covid official statistics from the start.

It was reasonably obvious that the pandemic was faked, from the start.

The obsession with recording every death within 28 days of a positive Covid test outcome regardless of any other factor (such as falling under the proverbial bus), together with the immediate discarding of all previously devised "pandemic planning" measures in favour of "vaccination" with a novel intervention developed at warp speed (meaning that only a short-term safety profile could possibly have been assessed) was striking evidence that the figures were being fiddled. This in the face of previously accepted knowledge that vaccinations were ineffective against a corona virus (such as the common cold) due to the rate of viral mutation, was frankly inexplicable to those old enough to know better. 

...

2026-08-25

This follows on from When Court Judgements Stray Off-Piste, an American case concerning child custody, in which he had a passing involvement which turned out to be significant.

Who knew that apparently straightforward court cases could be so nuanced? 

And nuances there are aplenty, enough indeed for the three further articles that Martin Geddes offers.

Two smoking guns, and just one envelope

What the two smoking guns reveal

...

2026-08-22

Martin Geddes analyses an American Court Case to pin-point the salient points at which judgement appears to have strayed.

Not because he wants it reviewed (maybe he does, maybe he doesn't) but because it's instructive to illustrate the various ways in which judgement can stray.

2026-08-23

Constitutional Cluedo.

2026-08-15

It seems that AI has its uses, and one of them is to analyse strange symbols and determine whether there is an encoded mesage.

There are questionable assertions in this video, not least the daft idea that exquisite circles of huge complexity could have been made overnight by a couple of guys with a plank without leaving any incriminating trace...

... nevertheless the idea that the global pattern of circles (by no means confined to England, although the English collection is undeniably the most profuse across the years) carries a consistent message is I believe genuinely new.

But still, the conclusion here remains elusive, since whilst "a message" is apparently robustly evident, its meaning is not.

I could hazard a reasonable interpretation of the message, but that would deprive you dear reader of the opportunity to investigate/speculate for yourself...

... and

2026-08-14

The Professor of Mischief strikes again, this time with an AI tool to analyse your scope for making the wrong decision by AI...

No doubt it could come in useful in all sorts of arenas, and just maybe it's a tool that should be automatically embedded within any AI-based system worth its salt to keep it within bounds. In a world of potentially rogue AIs, that could be a prerequisite!

Whether it would be feasible may be arguable of course, but perhaps it could form a basis for establishing whether a system based upon an AI could be regarded as fit for purpose. In a world of rapidly developing governmental and commercial systems so based, I'd say it's a no-brainer.

Would you fly with this AI?

2026-08-14

Make of this what you will.

For me, it reminds me that Tartaria was apparently run on free energy "from the atmosphere" - whatever that meant - and was destroyed shortly (in historical terms) before Tesla did his research.

Hmmmm...

(31 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-08-14

Regular readers will be familiar with the work of Martin Geddes.

On the verge of what we must all hope and pray is indeed a Great Awakening of Humanity to end the Great Deceit of Humanity, and thereby usher in a new World Order whose natural state is control by the common man from the bottom up, rather than control by the self-appointed elite from the top down, we find Martin in reflective mood, reviewing his place in a world gradually (and perchance then suddenly!) changing beyond anyone's expectation.

We might be wise to join him. We may all be in the same boat soon enough. And he from the start was on board with the Q phenomenon that has been perhaps the sheet anchor that held the whole extraordinary process together. At a minimum he pioneered the UK response to the project, and he has continued to pioneer the epistemology of failing systems (of which there seems to be no current shortage).

Perhaps mischievously he asked ChatGPT to comment on his

2026-08-09

In times of accelerating change, we cannot influence that change unless we understand the root causes.

And if we are unhappy with the current event stream, we need to review how that event stream is formed from our conscious and/or unconscious input.

If this sounds like too much Eastern mysticism to us, then maybe before we move on we might be wise to consider whether those Eastern mystics had a point...  after all, they may be revealing a control mechanism that we could actually influence! So what do we have to lose?

And BTW this view isn't confined only to Eastern mystics...   

NB: if, like me, you have no idea who Seth may be, it's not vital to our understanding.

What is important is that we recognise that we do live in times of enormous change, so

2026-08-07

No. not crop circles this time, something much, much bigger and more ancient...    but still involving AI.

(30 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-08-07

Those without imagination (unless you're an AI) should probably skip this - those with imagination might feel led to reach for a wet towel...

... this has progressed way beyond the capabilities of a couple of blokes with a plank.

So what's behind it all?

And who is it that's actually doing the learning?

(30 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-08-05

(24 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-08-03

Martin Geddes has spent an inordinately large part of his recent life investigating how legal systems degrade, and attributing that degradation to a reaction to stress - when the system is sufficiently stressed, something has to give in order for it to continue to operate.

So far so good.

The problem is that in so failing it may sacrifice aspects of its integrity.

And when integrity is sacrificed, how does the result differ from the same result deliberately engineered (or perhaps merely tolerated) for nefarious reasons?

"In honest hands it [law] constrains power. In dishonest hands it becomes a remarkably effective weapon for acquiring and preserving power while maintaining the outward appearance of legality."

Martin calls it "

2026-07-12

Can there be so much smoke without a fire?

The Bernician analyses the smoke signals, and reveals a system of revolving doors very reminiscent of those between Big Pharma and our Health Regulators.

Anybody might think the purpose of government is now primarily to launder our tax money to "private enterprise" - not just any enterprise of course, but certainly to those big American enterprises with CIA connections. Of course it's all subject to appropriate restrictions on confidentiality etc but who is to verify the truth of these activities?

What could possibly go wrong?

2026-07-10

Brendon O'Connell isn't one to pull his punches - but he is an Aussie so we must make allowances. And once you get his drift (it takes practice) he makes a good deal of sense.

How he "knows" everything that he comes up with (don't blink or you'll miss it) I've no idea, but it's obvious he's somehow been following a great many threads for a long time.

Is he right about everyone? I don't suppose so, but he does seem to be in a goodly number of correct ball-parks.

Does he realise that people can change (or be changed / swapped out) over time and a substitute (actor or AI based) used for new purposes? I don't know, but I do believe that the number of Nancy Pelosys we have seen over time is probably off the charts (not to mention Donald Trumps and Elon Musks and many others... ). That may make some of his assumptions about the famous and infamous holding consistent positions over time

2026-06-28

It's simple.

In a civilisation that inhabits an uncertain world, the supply of power makes the difference between carrying on almost as normal regardless of the salient ambient conditions, or having to keep shutting down because of them. 

And for most practical purposes (especially in a world besotted by a completely irrational fear of "climate change") power means that delivered by wires. So our governments have simultaneously increased the loading on the grid whilst replacing reliable electricity generation with erratic wind and solar...  whilst also adding power-hungry AI data centres to the mix.

What could possibly go wrong?

What could possibly go right?

Nick Hubble spells it out.

2026-06-27

AI, Big Business, blanket surveillance, mix it together and what do you get?

(44 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-06-08

"South America is being reshaped by the war that Trump is waging against the City of London"

"Russia warning the EU and the United States to pull their diplomats before launching the missile salvo is, in Krainer's reading, a message to the actual instigator of the war, not to the proxy"

"A country that controls its own money, its own food, and its own resources, that operates for the benefit of its people, is a country that cannot be ruled by London"

"The Crown of England remains under duress. The City is the occupier"

Yes, there's a surreptitious war being waged against the once secret nest of vampires that inhabit their enclave in the heart of London.

But it's obviously just an idiotic conspiracy theory, so pay no

2026-06-06

... but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places  -  St Paul's letter to the Ephesians 6:12

Many will be completely unprepared for this article. 

Yes it has support from St Paul, but his letters form just a tiny portion of the Biblical story as taught for generations by the various Churches. Regular readers will know that this site does not consider itself bound within the confines of the teachings of those who used to burn heretics (AKA truth-seekers) at the stake!

There is a reason why we look outside the Good Book for our daily lives...   and that is because "the Good Lord moves in mysterious ways